Assessment of Jordanian physicians' knowledge about venous thromboembolism risk and management among COVID-19 patients

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess Jordanian physicians' awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk among COVID-19 patients and its treatment protocol. Method(s): This was a cross-sectional-based survey that was conducted in Jordan in 2020. During the study period, a convenience sample of physicians working in various Jordanian hospitals were invited to participate in this study. Physicians' knowledge was evaluated and physicians gained one point for each correct answer. Then, a knowledge score out of 23 was calculated for each. Key Findings: In this study, 102 physicians were recruited. Results from this study showed that most of the physicians realize that all COVID-19 patients need VTE risk assessment (n = 69, 67.6%). Regarding VTE prophylaxis, the majority of physicians (n = 91, 89.2%) agreed that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the best prophylactic option for mild-moderate COVID-19 patients with high VTE risk. Regarding severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients, 75.5% of physicians (n = 77) recognized that LMWH is the correct prophylactic option in this case, while 80.4% of them (n = 82) knew that mechanical prevention is the preferred prophylactic option for severe/critically ill COVID-19 patients with high bleeding risk. Moreover, 77.5% of physicians (n = 79) knew that LMWH is the treatment of choice for COVID-19 patients diagnosed with VTE. Finally, linear regression analysis showed that consultants had an overall higher knowledge score about VTE prevention and treatment in COVID-19 patients compared with residents (P = 0.009). Conclusion(s): All physicians knew about VTE risk factors for COVID-19 patients. However, consultants showed better awareness of VTE prophylaxis and treatment compared with residents. We recommend educational workshops be conducted to enhance physicians' knowledge and awareness about VTE thromboprophylaxis and management in COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved.

Effect of Anticoagulant Administration in patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 - A study from Lahore, Pakistan

Background: The recognition of the relationship between thromboembolism in COVID-19 and poor clinical outcomes led to the use of anticoagulants in patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Aim(s): To determine the effects of anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients and to compare the effect of oral, subcutaneous, and combined anticoagulants on patient outcomes. Study design: Retrospective cohort study Place and duration: A private tertiary care hospital, in Lahore, from 1st April 2020 to 30 Sep 2020 Methodology: Data were collected from electronic and paper records of admitted patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 on PCR or with a radiological diagnosis of COVID-19. A total of 179 patients were included in the study, 172 were given anticoagulation, out of these, 74 were given oral anticoagulation, 73 were given subcutaneous and 24 were given combination of oral and subcutaneous anticoagulants. Result(s): Among 172 patients on anticoagulants, 41(23.8%) expired while 131(76.2%) recovered. Among 7(100%) patients on no anticoagulation, 1(14.3%) patient expired while 6(85.7%) recovered. 19(11%) patients on anticoagulation progressed towards the need for invasive ventilation while 152(89%) patients did not need invasive ventilation. Among patients on subcutaneous anticoagulants, 27(37%) expired while 46(63%) recovered. 8(33.3%) patients on combined anticoagulants expired while 16(66.7%) recovered. 6(8.1%) patients on oral anticoagulants expired while 68(91.9%) recovered. Conclusion(s): Anticoagulation improves the outcome of COVID-19 patients and oral anticoagulation is better than subcutaneous and combined anticoagulation.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.

Elevated INR in a COVID-19 patient after concomitant administration of azvudine and anticoagulants.

Background: Azvudine (FNC) is a promising treatment candidate for managing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, drug interactions with azvudine have been poorly studied, especially with no reported cases of azvudine with anticoagulants such as warfarin and rivaroxaban. Case summary: The patient was diagnosed with lower limb venous thrombosis and took warfarin regularly. The international normalized ratio (INR) was stable (2.0-3.0). However, the INR increased to 7.52 after administering azvudine. The patient had no other factors justifying this change. This increase in INR occurred again with the administration of azvudine in combination with rivaroxaban, and the INR increased to 18.91. After azvudine administration was stopped, the INR did not increase when rivaroxaban was used alone. Conclusion: Azvudine, warfarin, and rivaroxaban might have previously unidentified drug interactions that increased the INR. Therefore, the INR must be closely monitored when they are concomitantly administered in COVID-19 patients.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Zanubrutinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL): Final Analysis of the Magnolia (BGB-3111-214) Trial

Introduction: Advanced MZL is generally incurable, with periods of remission and relapse. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a potent and highly specific next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was approved in the US and Canada for R/R MZL based on the MAGNOLIA primary analysis (BGB- 3111-214;NCT03846427);here, the final MAGNOLIA analysis is presented. Method(s): This was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of adult patients (pts) with R/R MZL (>=1 prior CD20-directed therapy). Zanubrutinib (160 mg twice daily) was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) per Lugano classification. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy was assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)-based Lugano criteria for IRC-confirmed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease at baseline;non-avid disease was assessed by computed tomography (CT)-based criteria. Result(s): As of May 4, 2022, 68 pts were treated (median age=70 y [range 37-95];>=75 y=27.9%). MZL subtypes included extranodal (38.2%), nodal (38.2%), splenic (17.6%), and unknown (5.9%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6);32.4% of pts had disease refractory to last therapy, most (89.7%) had prior chemoimmunotherapy, and 7 (10.3%) had rituximab monotherapy as their only prior treatment. Sixty-one pts (89.7%) had FDG-avid disease. After a median follow-up of 28.0 mos (range 1.6-32.9) and a median treatment duration of 24.2 mos (range 0.9-32.9), 66 pts were efficacy- evaluable. IRC-assessed ORR (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]) was 68.2% (CR=25.8%). By subtype, (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)ORR/CR rates were 64.0%/40.0% (extranodal), 76.0%/20.0% (nodal), 66.7%/8.3% (splenic), and 50.0%/25.0% (unknown). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. Over 70.0% of pts were alive or progression-free after 2 years (Figure). Sensitivity analysis using only CT-based criteria (n=66) showed an ORR of 66.7% and CR of 24.2%. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were bruising (23.5%), diarrhea (22.1%), and constipation (17.6%). Neutropenia (8.8%) and COVID-19 pneumonia (5.9%) were the most common Grade >=3 AEs. Five pts (7.4%) died due to unrelated AEs: COVID-19 pneumonia=2, acute myeloid leukemia=1, myocardial infarction=1, septic encephalopathy=1. Hypertension occurred in 3 pts (4.4%), atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in 1 pt (1.5%) each;none led to treatment withdrawal. One pt (1.5%) had a Grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage while receiving rivaroxaban. None of the pts required dose reduction. Conclusion(s): In this final analysis with over 2 years of median follow-up, zanubrutinib continues to demonstrate durable disease control and was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals observedCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Rivaroxaban for Prevention of Thrombotic Events, Hospitalization, and Death in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is associated with heightened risks of venous and arterial thrombosis and hospitalization due to respiratory failure. To assess whether prophylactic anticoagulation can safely reduce the frequency of venous and arterial thrombosis, hospitalization, and death in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor, we conducted the PREVENT-HD double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial (A Study of Rivaroxaban to Reduce the Risk of Major Venous and Arterial Thrombotic Events, Hospitalization and Death in Medically Ill Outpatients With Acute, Symptomatic COVID-19] Infection). METHODS: PREVENT-HD was conducted between August 2020 and April 2022 at 14 US integrated health care delivery networks. A virtual trial design used remote informed consent and clinical monitoring and facilitated data collection through electronic health record integration with a cloud-based research platform. Nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban or placebo daily for 35 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first occurrence of a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic arterial embolism, hospitalization, or death through day 35. The principal safety end point was International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis critical-site or fatal bleeding. The last study visit was on day 49. RESULTS: The study was terminated prematurely because of enrollment challenges and a lower-than-expected blinded pooled event rate. A total of 1284 patients underwent randomization with complete accrual of primary events through May 2022. No patients were lost to follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 22 of 641 in the rivaroxaban group and 19 of 643 in the placebo group (3.4% versus 3.0%; hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.15]; P=0.63). No patient in either group experienced critical-site or fatal bleeding. One patient receiving rivaroxaban had a major bleed. CONCLUSIONS: The study was terminated prematurely after enrollment of 32% of planned accrual because of recruitment challenges and lower-than-expected event rate. Rivaroxaban prescribed for 35 days in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis did not appear to reduce a composite end point of venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04508023.

Risk and Management of Bleeding Complications with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: a Narrative Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent conditions with a significant healthcare burden, and represent the main indications for anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the first choice treatment of AF/VTE, and have become the most prescribed class of anticoagulants globally, overtaking vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Compared to VKAs, DOACs have a similar or better efficacy/safety profile, with reduced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), while the risk of major bleeding and other bleeding harms may vary depending on the type of DOAC. We have critically reviewed available evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the risk of bleeding complications of DOACs compared to VKAs in patients with AF and VTE. Special patient populations (e.g., elderly, extreme body weights, chronic kidney disease) have specifically been addressed. Management of bleeding complications and possible resumption of anticoagulation, in particular after ICH and gastrointestinal bleeding, are also discussed. Finally, some suggestions are provided to choose the optimal DOAC to minimize adverse events according to individual patient characteristics and bleeding risk.

Left Ventricular Thrombosis: Current Perspective and Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants br

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious risk factor for systemic embolism development. Despite the evident danger of this condition, currentguidelines describe management of patients with this potentially fatal complication very briefly. LVT can complicate myocardial infarction where its in-cidence is around 10%, as well as various forms of cardiomyopathies and novel coronavirus infection. According to clinical guidelines vitamin K antag-onists (VKAs) should be used as treatment of choice for thrombus resolution. However, experts point out that this therapy lacks necessary evidentialbase and bears certain difficulties because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamical properties of VKAs. These drawbacks are absent in direct oralanticoagulants (DOACs), the possibility of using which in LVT is being actively studied. As for now, published results of 3 randomised clinical trialshave demonstrated similar safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs and VKAs. Similarly, the majority of retrospective cohort studies did not observesignificant differences between two groups, where some of them have shown superiority of DOACs especially in terms of earlier thrombus resolution.Nevertheless, some studies have found DOACs ineffective and even potentially unsafe regarding systemic embolism. Existing data does not allow toform an unambiguous conclusion about the equivalence of DOACs and VKAs for LVT resolution. Large randomised clinical trials are needed todetermine efficacy and safety of such treatment in these patients.

Drug-induced pericarditis

Though not common, drug-induced pericarditis is a serious condition, since pericardial tamponade, should it develop, may be life-threatening. As the number of drugs is constantly expanding, so does the proportion of those capable of causing pericarditis. The authors reviewed the relevant literature in the PubMed database and complemented it with information from the VigiBase database. In their article, the authors present current knowledge about the mechanisms of origin and level of risk of drug-induced pericarditis and discuss relevant information on individual drugs divided into 7 classes. Some medicines are associated with a high risk of developing pericarditis, a fact to be taken into account when treating patients with these agents. © 2022 Czech Society of Cardiology Z.S. All rights reserved.

Clinical Profile, Immunosuppressive Managment and Outcome in Adult Renal Allograft Recipients with Covid-19 Infection: A Case Series from Single Centre in Bangladesh

Introduction: The Novel Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a respiratory infection has become a global concern. Given to the extent of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been explored that Renal Allograft Recipients are considered high risk group for unfavourable outcome due to multiple comorbidities, long term immunosuppressive medications and residual CKD. This case series demonstrates clinical characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 infection in Renal Allograft Recipients. Method(s): Here we present 20 adult Renal Allograft Recipients admitted with moderate to severe symptom and RT PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection at united hospital limited from August 2020 to December 2021. We assessed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters, radiological findings, immunosuppressive management and outcome. Result(s): Among all,15 patients were male with median age 55 years (range,34-75years). Mean time interval between renal transplantation were 90 months (24-132 months). Common comorbidities were hypertension (n=19), DM (n=18), lung diseases (n=13), IHD (n=9). Fever (100%) was most common symptom followed by cough(80%), sore throat(75%), and diarrhoea(60%). Nine (45%) patients who presented with dyspnoea during admission further progressed to poor outcome. During admission mean baseline creatinine was 1.51mg/dl(0.66-3.1 mg/dl), 15 patients had lymphopenia and 11 patients had higher inflammatory markers like high ferritin level, CRP, procalcitonin, LDH and D-dimer. Total 15 patients had abnormal HRCT findings and most common finding was unilateral or bilateral Ground glass opacity followed by consolidation, pleural effusion and interlobular septal thickening with mean TSS scoring being 8 (range 4-16). All patients were on triple immunosuppressive regimen (antimetabolites, CNI, low dose steroid).After admission antimetabolites were withdrawn in all patients, CNI were continued in 10 patients, 50% reduction in 2 patients, complete cessation of CNI in 8 patients and low dose steroids were switched to dexamethasone 6mg/ day. Other treatments included antiviral (Favipiravir, Remdisivir), antibiotics, LMWH followed by Rivaroxaban. Total 3 patients received Tocilizumab and Convalescent plasma was administered in 2 patients. Among all, 18 patients received different form of oxygen therapy, 9 patients were transferred to ICU, 7 patients required mechanical ventilation and 4 patients developed ARDS. 8 patients had other bacterial or fungal coinfection. six patients developed AKI and 2 of them needed Renal replacement therapy (RRT). Total 4 patients of AKI and 1 patient who required RRT finally expired. Total 6 patients died and after a median 18 days of admission. Conclusion(s): In this case series we describe 30% mortality rate. Older age, severe symptom specially dyspnoea during presentation, multiple comorbidities, high inflammatory markers, high baseline creatinine developing AKI, high TSS score at HRCT and requirement of mechanical ventilation were associated with high risk of death. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

A contrasting diagnosis: iododerma

An 86-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with acute shortness of breath. She was treated with intravenous furosemide for acute-on-chronic heart failure. Her past medical history included atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diverticulosis and hypothyroidism. Rivaroxaban and levothyroxine were her only long-term medications. On day 5 of hospital admission, she developed painful haemorrhagic and purulent bullae on her dorsal hands, head and neck. These evolved to large suppurative, vegetative plaques over a 72 h period and she developed additional lesions on her trunk, upper back and thighs. The patient had routine blood tests, which showed a raised C-reactive protein at 260 mg L-1, and an acute kidney injury with a glomerular filtration rate of 54 mL-1 min-1. She had a negative COVID-19 swab, and swabs from the lesions for bacterial culture and viral polymerase chain reaction were negative. She had a normal serum protein electrophoresis, immunoglobulin, antinuclear antibody and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. She had computed tomography of her chest 24 h prior to the onset of her lesions, which showed mild bilateral pleural effusions in keeping with fluid overload secondary to heart failure. A biopsy taken from her hand showed orthokeratosis and parakeratosis, and there was bulla formation subepidermally. There was a dense neutrophilic infiltrate with microabscess formation with scattered eosinophils and lymphocytes. There was no evidence of vasculitis. Direct immunofluorescence was negative and a tissue culture for atypical mycobacteria was negative. The patient was commenced on high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone at 500 mg for 3 days followed by 40 mg prednisolone orally for 1 week, but there was a limited response. Our initial differential was Sweet syndrome or pyoderma vegetans;however, the patient had no fevers and no risk factors (malignancy, inflammatory disease, infection, etc.). She also had no response to high-dose oral prednisolone. Given the timing of her CT examination in relation to her acute dermatosis and the use of radioiodine for contrast, we assessed the patient's serum iodine and urine iodine. These were both high at 1.02 mmol L-1 (reference interval 0.32- 0.63) and 3.46 mmol L-1 (reference interval 0.0-2.43), respectively. A diagnosis of iododerma was made. The patient's eruption slowly resolved and at 12 weeks there was evidence of postinflammatory skin changes only. Her urine and serum iodine were rechecked, and both had normalized. In the last 20 years there have been approximately 20 case reports of iododerma. Most have been following iodine contrast use in patients with abnormal kidney function, like our patient. Most describe an acneiform eruption that subsequently evolves to vegetative plaques (Chalela JG, Aguilar L. Iododerma from contrast material. N Engl J Med 2016;374: 2477). Iododerma is largely a diagnosis of exclusion, but histopathology and urine and serum iodine levels can help support diagnosis.

Single-Dose Bioequivalence Study of Rivaroxaban-Containing Medicinal Products in Healthy Volunteers.

Therapeutically, new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered to be non-inferior or superior to vitamin K antagonists (warfarin). NOACs are included in current guidelines for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases. Rivaroxaban medicinal products have been shown to effectively fight thrombotic complications of the new coronavirus infection, COVID-19. The wide clinical use of rivaroxaban products motivates the development of generics. The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of rivaroxaban medicinal products in a single-dose bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. Material(s) and Method(s): the bioequivalence study compared single-dose oral administration of Rivaroxaban, 10 mg film-coated tablets (NovaMedica Innotech LLC, Russia), and the reference product Xarelto, 10 mg film-coated tablets (Bayer AG, Germany), in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. The open, randomised, crossover trial included 46 healthy volunteers. Each of the medicinal products (the test product and the reference product) was administered once;blood samples were collected during the 48 h after the administration. The washout between the study periods lasted 7 days. Rivaroxaban was quantified in plasma samples of the volunteers by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Result(s): no adverse events or serious adverse events were reported for the test and reference products during the study. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained for Rivaroxaban and Xarelto, respectively: Cmax of 134.6 +/- 58.0 ng/mL and 139.9 +/- 49.3 ng/mL, AUC0-48 of 949.7 +/- 354.5 ngxh/mL and 967.6 +/- 319.9 ngxh/mL, AUC0- of 986.9 +/- 379.7 ngxh/mL and 1003.6 +/- 320.4 ngxh/mL, T1/2 of 8.2 +/- 3.2 h and 7.8 +/- 3.3 h. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-48, and AUC0- geometric means were 88.04-108.67%, 89.42-104.92% and 89.44-104.81%, respectively. Conclusion(s): the test product Rivaroxaban and the reference product Xarelto were found to have similar rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and safety profiles. The study demonstrated bioequivalence of the medicinal products.Copyright © 2022 Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. All rights reserved.

Acute Massive Thrombus Following Fontan Procedure

Background Patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) undergo a Fontan procedure as part of single ventricle surgical palliation. Post-Fontan, sluggish blood flow and an imbalance in coagulant factor proteins may predispose to thrombus formation. Other risk factors may include chylothorax as well as acute and chronic inflammation. Currently, there is no standardized surveillance strategy to detect thrombus in Fontan patients. Case A 34-month old male with HLHS underwent an extracardiac non-fenestrated Fontan complicated by chylothorax treated with 5 days of IV steroids and diuretics. He was on therapeutic aspirin. After progressive worsening of right pleural effusion, a chest tube was placed three weeks post-Fontan with continued chylous output. Stool alpha 1 antitrypsin was negative. Decision-making Given persistent chylothorax, a repeat echocardiogram was performed revealing a large mass in the Fontan circuit less than one month post-op. Cardiac CT showed occlusive thrombus filling the entirety of the Fontan conduit extending into hepatic veins and bilateral pulmonary arteries. He underwent extensive surgical thrombectomy and Fontan conduit revision. Hypercoagulable work-up revealed elevated factor 8 and von Willebrand factor activity which persisted more than one month post-op. Patient's history was also significant for COVID-19 infection 6 months prior. He was initially anticoagulated with bivalirudin with tirofiban initiated for antiplatelet therapy. He was ultimately transitioned to rivaroxaban, pentoxifylline and aspirin with chylothorax resolution over one month without thrombus recurrence. Conclusion Development of risk stratification tools to identify patients at higher risk for thrombi formation post-Fontan may facilitate patient selection for more aggressive anticoagulation. Consideration of elevated factor 8 as well as persistent or recurrent chylothorax may be beneficial, as increased thrombosis risk has been reported for both conditions in Fontan patients.Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

When and What to Consider Knee Arthroscopy Surgery in Post-COVID 19 Infected Patients

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is the worst pandemic ever recorded in history, as of this day more than 545 million people infected and more than 6 million cumulative deaths. COVID 19 is primarily respiratory disease, however non-respiratory presentations that could be manifested are venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Both pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are the most frequently thrombotic events in COVID-19. Knee arthroscopy surgery is the one of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures nowadays, with the most common procedures are meniscectomy, meniscal repair and cruciate ligament reconstruction. Although knee arthroscopy is known to be a safe procedure, several complications could be found with the 3 most common complications are DVT, effusion and synovitis, and PE. We reported a case series of four patients with DVT post knee arthroscopy anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during 2021. The DVT diagnosis was retained on clinical presentation and elevated of D-dimer testing. The patient's mean age was 35,25 years, and all of the patients had no risk factors of DVT, although they had COVID-19 infection within 3 months before surgery. The most common clinical presentation was swelling on the lower leg (around the ankle) with slightly pain and numbness. Only one patient had severe pain around the thigh. All of the patients had elevated D-dimer testing result with mean of D-dimer 1250 (normal value < 500). Only one patient had sonography testing and found proximal DVT. One of the patients had DVT at post operative day (POD) 3, one at POD 4 and the other two at POD 5. Three of the patients improved with oral anticoagulant therapy using rivaroxaban (XARELTO). In one patient the symptom was not improved after two days oral anticoagulant therapy and underwent thrombectomy by vascular surgeon. DVT is the most common complication of knee arthroscopy and also the most common non-respiratory events of COVID-19 infection. Routinely administration of thromboprophylaxis agent was not recommended, pre-operative risk assessment of DVT should be used, especially in post-COVID 19 patients.

A Persistent Nightmare: A Case of Recurrent Brachial Artery Thrombosis

Background Brachial artery thrombosis can be seen with thromboembolism, hypercoagulability, and arterial thoracic outlet syndrome. Case A 33-year-old healthy female construction worker presented with right hand discoloration and pain. She suffered a COVID-19 infection 8 weeks prior with hand symptoms developing shortly thereafter. She could no longer work due to the pain. Duplex ultrasound and CTA of the right upper extremity (Figure) demonstrated localized thrombosis of the right brachial artery. The workup yielded no aortic or intracardiac thrombus, and cardiac event monitor showed no atrial arrhythmia. She underwent thrombectomy with brachial artery stenting and was found, during surgery, to have distal ulnar artery occlusion. Two days post-op, she had recurrent pain and was found to have brachial artery recurrent thrombosis. She underwent urgent brachial-brachial bypass. Arm pain continued despite graft patency, so ulnarpalmar bypass was performed. Decision-making Hypercoagulability workup, including antiphospholipid antibody, protein C, protein S, homocysteine, and Lp(a), was negative. Neither central thrombus on TEE nor evidence of thoracic outlet syndrome was found. As a diagnosis of exclusion, brachial artery thrombosis was ascribed to COVID infection. Despite rivaroxaban, the patient developed gangrene (Panel C) requiring partial digit amputation. Conclusion We present a case of COVID-19-induced recurrent brachial artery thrombosis despite surgical intervention. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Late Pulmonary Embolism after COVID-19 Pneumonia despite Adequate Rivaroxaban Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 infection may predispose patients to thrombotic disease. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who are receiving non-vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants for chronic disease are usually switched to heparin treatment during hospitalization. However, information about the most appropriate antithrombotic therapy after the acute infection phase is lacking. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of a patient with chronic atrial fibrillation who was recently hospitalized for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Four weeks after discharge he experienced an episode of an acute pulmonary embolism while on rivaroxaban therapy with adequate drug plasma levels, and in the absence of strong predisposing risk factors. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the risk of thrombotic complications after COVID-19 infection, raises some concern about their underlying mechanisms, and supports the use of effective anti-thrombotic therapy. LEARNING POINTS: COVID-19 infection is associated with frequent thrombotic events.A pro-coagulative status could be triggered by the persistent inflammatory phase of the infection despite anticoagulation.Adequate antithrombotic therapy is necessary for the prevention of acute and later thrombotic complications and needs close monitoring.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-led drive-up anticoagulation clinic during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic

Background: The University of Kentucky HealthCare Anticoagulation Clinic at the Gill Heart and Vascular Institute in Lexington, Kentucky, designed and implemented a drive-up clinic for warfarin management with the goal to minimize person-to-person exposure during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on warfarin management in a pharmacist-led anticoagulation service when transitioned from an in-person clinic to a drive-up clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 68 patients seen in the University of Kentucky HealthCare Anticoagulation Clinic on warfarin therapy for any indication. Patients were included if they had scheduled visits at least 3 times in the period 6 months before, during, and after the initiation of the drive-up clinic. The primary outcome is the difference in time in therapeutic range (TTR) before and during the drive-up clinic. Results: The difference between the mean TTR in period 1 (69.1% ± 23.2%) and period 2 (69.6% ± 19.2%) was not statistically significant (P = 0.882). The mean TTR in period 3 (70.5% ± 20.8%) did not differ in statistical significance from either period 1 (P = 0.688) or period 2 (P = 0.746). Safety outcomes including reported bleeding events and emergency department visits or hospital admissions for bleeding or thrombotic events were consistently low across each period. Conclusion: The results of this study illustrate that a drive-up clinic for warfarin management may be a reasonable alternative approach to providing care for outpatient anticoagulant management and may support nontraditional clinic models for long-term management of anticoagulation and other chronic disease states.

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS ANTICOAGULANTS IN COVID-19 INDIAN SUBJECTS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Background: To assess the efficacy of various anticoagulants being prescribed in the COVID 19 induced hypercoagulability, so as to know optimally effective anticoagulant. Methods: This was a Indian observational study conducted in our covid centre at vijayawada,Andhra Pradesh between june 2020 to January 2021 . Results: A total of 100 COVID 19 subjects were included. The patients were found to be matched with respect to age, gender, diet and past history of various illnesses. Gender wise more males (60 patients)are affected when compared to females(40 patients). Age group more affected are less than or equal to 50yrs . Comorbidites like Diabetes(67patients),cardiac problems(62patients), dyslipidemia(62patients) were seen. Risk factors like smoking(52patients), alcoholism(50patients) noticed. Almost all subjects are RTPCR positive. IL- 6,CRP,LDH high in most subjects. Ferritin and PT/INR are normal in more subjects. Out of 100 patients oxygen is required in 48 subjects and BIPAP/CPAP required in 26 subjects. Death occurred in 24 patients (2 with CVA,22 with myocardial infraction). Mortality rate is more in vegetarians. More patients in our study belongs to CORADS score 4 and 5. D-dimer are increased in 67subjects. IL-6 are increased in 68patients . Frequency of subjects with raised D-dimer (p = 0.049) and CRP (p = 0.002) levels were found to be benefitted on receiving nattokinase. However, no other parameters such as IL-6 (p = 0.068) ferritin (p = 0.396), ESR (p = 0.278), PT/INR (p = 0.47) LDH (p = 0.34) or CORADS staging achieved such significant association. Also need of interventions such as Oxygen (p = 0.001), BIPAP/CPAP (p < 0.0001) were low in patients on nattokinase. No significant difference was noted in follow up investigations such as PT/INR (p = 0.31) and other markers (D-dimer, IL-6, LDH, CRP) (p = 0.55). No bleeding episodes were reported in subjects on nattokinase. Significant low rate of death was found in subjects who received nattokinase (p < 0.0001) and rivaroxaban (p < 0.0001). Also, significantly higher mortality rate was observed in subjects who required to be put on oxygen (p < 0.0001) as well as BIPAP/CPAP (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Nattokinase simultaneously effects several key favourable benefits for thrombosis, hypertension, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidaemia, platelet aggregation, and neuroprotection in patients with COVID 19 infection. (Figure Presented).

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Crisis Triggered by Anticoagulant Switch

Case report - Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to drastic changes for some patients on warfarin for venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease and atrial fibrillation. Warfarin monitoring necessitates frequent interaction with healthcare workers, which is sufficiently risky for COVID-19 transmission. As a result, selected patients were swapped over to novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Our patient was changed without investigating for antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS);it later transpired he was triple antibody positive. He presented in a crisis and we describe his narrative. Patients on warfarin due to presumed unprovoked venous thromboembolic disease should not be swapped to NOACs without completing, or checking, previous antiphospholipid antibody testing. Case report - Case description: A 73-year-old gentleman presented locally in August 2020 with erythema over the anterolateral surface of his left leg. He was initially treated with antibiotics for presumed cellulitis. Within a few days this lesion became necrotic and rapidly spread. At this point, he was transferred to a tertiary rheumatology centre. Within days to weeks, he developed several necrotic lesions affecting his trunk and limbs, with facial sparing noted. Approximately 30-35% of his whole-body surface became involved. He soon developed an oxygen requirement, with CTPA demonstrating lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis without evidence of pulmonary emboli (PE). Throughout his admission, he had several other pathologies such as hyponatraemia that required level 2 care and severe noninfectious diarrhoea. Skin biopsy identified thrombotic vasculopathy. Serology confirmed triple positive antiphospholipid antibody status and a dsDNA titre of>400 iU/mL. This was the first-time serology had been undertaken despite a history of three deep vein thrombosis (DVT) episodes and two PE incidents. He had no history of SLE symptoms. His initial management for vasculitis secondary to APLS at the point of limited necrosis consisted of IV methylprednisolone followed by rituximab and PO prednisolone. While there was some delay in the progression of his disease, new areas of necrosis arose, leading to the patient receiving cyclophosphamide. Low molecular weight heparin was used for anticoagulation. This gentleman later developed proteinuria and neurological symptoms, fulfilling the criteria for catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. He received plasma exchange, without an improvement. He developed complications from his disease and treatment, including poor wound healing. It became apparent his condition would not improve and active treatments were stopped. He passed away 6 weeks after initial presentation. Prior to his admission to hospital, his warfarin was swapped to a NOAC. This is thought to have been the trigger behind catastrophic thrombosis. Case report - Discussion: After excluding other conditions such as necrotising fasciitis, this gentleman was rapidly started on IV methylprednisolone to halt any further progression. This is because glucocorticoids have the greatest evidence base for managing this poorly understood acute disease manifestation. After this failed to manage his condition, he was given a further immunosuppressive agent in the form of rituximab. This was used after his serology confirmed triple antibody status. It was hoped this would stop any further immunological mediated disease progression. Oral prednisolone was started at 40mg at this stage and kept under review with a tapering schedule. Cyclophosphamide was given within a few days of rituximab, with hope of a quicker onset of action. A careful MDT decision was made on these drug choices, particularly regarding their combined use and appreciating their side effect profiles. Cyclophosphamide has evidence behind its use, especially for those with APLS associated with lupus. While he did not develop any infections related to treatment, his condition progressed. Case reports suggest that plasma exchange can be useful in the management of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, so the team recommen ed this. Consent at this stage became tricky due to his altered mental status, but it was felt he did demonstrate capacity for this specific decision. As his condition did not improve after this level of immunosuppression, the team reached the decision that no other treatments would likely change the outcome. He remained on oral steroids for the remainder of his admission. The other management facet of APLS crises pertains to anticoagulation. Low molecular weight heparin was recommended by the haematologists. His NOAC was stopped after the diagnosis was confirmed. Warfarin was restarted later in his admission given he had been well on this for years. Case report - Key learning points: This fascinating case exemplifies the importance of completing an antiphospholipid antibody screen for patients who present with unprovoked venous thromboembolic disease. NOACs are commonly used anticoagulant medications. Several case reports have demonstrated that patients with antiphospholipid syndrome experience breakthrough thromboembolic events when treated with NOACs. The highest risk is associated with history of arterial thrombosis and those with triple positive antibody status. Three clinical trials have either been completed or are in the process of investigating whether NOACs sufficiently prevent thromboembolic disease in these patients. The TRAPS study compared rivaroxaban to warfarin in those with triple antibody positive antiphospholipid syndrome. The study was terminated early given that higher adverse events were observed in the rivaroxaban arm (19%, n11/59) versus warfarinised patients (3%, n2/61). The RAPS study found no difference in thromboembolic risk and results from the ASTRO-APS study looking into apixaban are awaited. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that NOACs prevent VTE in a similar fashion to warfarin, so many still advocate the use of warfarin. The optimal immune management of this acute complication is not well elucidated, with a shortfall in mechanistic pathological understanding. The conference will generate discussion on this subject matter in detail. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been observed for patients to change anticoagulation from warfarin to NOACs. Given NOACs do not require monitoring, this medication change reduces the number of interactions patients have with healthcare services. We postulate this change triggered the crisis in our patient, where we suggest continuation of warfarin would have been ideal. This is due to the history of several unprovoked thromboembolic events without a prior antiphospholipid screen being completed. Dissemination of learning points from this case are imperative to ensure decision-making encompasses patients who may have undiagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome.

Some Aspects of Rehabilitation of Postcovid Patients with Ischemic Stroke

The problem of studying the features of the dynamics of neurological deficit and cognitive functions in the early recovery period in post-COVID patients with IS and optimizing therapy is becoming of national importance and an urgent need. Purpose of the study: To study the features of the dynamics of neurological deficit and higher brain functions in the early recovery period of ischemic stroke in post-COVID patients, with an assessment of the effectiveness of modified drug and non-drug programs of rehabilitation therapy. Materials and research methods: A total of 80 patients took part in the clinical study. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 - post-COVID patients with IS, Group 2 - non-COVID patients with IS. Result(s): The inclusion of ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate and rivaroxaban in standard therapy met expectations and showed its positive role in reducing the recovery time of patients' functions, as determined using BDNF and cortisol biomarkers, as well as using data from the Rankin, Rivermead, MoCa and NIHHS scales. Conclusion(s): Based on the results of the obtained data, the effectiveness of the approved therapy in the rehabilitation of post-COVID patients with ischemic stroke was established. Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.